Shifting entropy elsewhere (2022)

Viewpoint

    Dan M. Stamper-Kurn

    • Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
    • and Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

• Physics 2, 80

New methods for lowering the entropy of ultracold gases may allow observation of more subtle quantum materials.

Shifting entropy elsewhere (2)

Shifting entropy elsewhere (3)

×

(Video) Why Time Actually Flows Both Ways

Ultracold atoms are still too hot. This may seem a ridiculous claim—after all, the low-temperature exploits of the purveyors of quantum gases are notorious. Laser cooling can flash-freeze atoms to temperatures in the micro- and nanokelvin range. In the mid 1990s, researchers followed this with evaporative cooling of atoms out of shallow traps and made the first gaseous Bose-Einstein condensates appear at temperatures of 20nK [1]. With slow and careful cooling by decompression, quantum gases have plummeted to as low as 500pK [2].

So how can such low temperatures still be too high? Let us start with the premise that, over its few-hundred-year-old history, low-temperature physics has sought constantly to discern ever subtler forms of organization in nature. Here, the definition of “subtle” is itself rather subtle, and certainly subjective, but essentially one wants to look beyond obvious forms of order, which arise from stronger and thus more familiar forms of interaction and which are easily described and understood. In a paper in Physical Review Letters, Jacopo Catani and colleagues at the University of Florence and the University of Trento, Italy, now report their exploration of an experimental method for entering a richer realm of quantum ordering [3].

The atomic physics temperature problem is really one of scales, both metaphysical and physical. The troubling metaphysical scale is that of the present scientific ambitions of the cold-atoms community. For many in this community, the cold-atomic materials that have been explored so fruitfully are still too “obvious,” in that mean-field theories with locally defined classical order parameters provide quite suitable descriptions for Bose-Einstein condensates, Cooper-paired Fermi gases, the scalar bosonic Mott insulator state, and so forth. Rather, many want to create forms of matter that are essentially quantum mechanical—the two most-discussed candidates being quantum magnets and analogues of high-temperature superconductors. Such states are marked by strong quantum fluctuations that preclude obvious forms of order and thus allow subtly correlated types of order to arise.

This ultrahigh ambition requires ultralow temperatures because of the physical scales of energy and entropy that are involved. For example, in many proposals for the production of subtle quantum matter, the atoms are assumed to be trapped at roughly a filling factor of unity within a periodic corrugated potential—an optical lattice—established at the intersection of several laser beams. We obtain a natural energy scale εk as the kinetic energy of an atom with a deBroglie wavelength matching the spacing between lattice sites. With this spacing being on the order of 1μm and an atomic mass of typically 50amu, we find εkkBx200nK. This temperature scale seems reasonably balmy, but recall that in solid-state systems, with the electron being so much lighter than an atom and the lattice spacing being so much smaller than the wavelength of laser light, the corresponding temperature—related to the electronic Fermi energy—is in the range of 10000K. Yet the subtle forms of electronic quantum matter probed in today’s laboratories are sought at the kelvin range and below. This discouraging temperature factor of 10-4 is partly mitigated in atomic systems by tuning various system parameters. For example, one may seek to generate subtle forms of quantum magnetism, induced by the superexchange spin-spin interaction, in the case where one maximizes interaction energies by resonant interatomic collisions and where the constituent atoms are just barely confined to their lattice sites. Still, temperatures in the sub- (or sub-sub-) nanokelvin range are typically required.

Cold-atoms experimentalists have already glimpsed the subnanokelvin temperature regime. Yet, while the temperature of these ultracoldest gases is suitably low, their entropy remains too high. Indeed, the typical procedure adopted in cold-atom experiments today is to prepare initially bulk quantum gases (bosons, fermions, or admixtures of the two) at the very lowest entropy possible, measured by the ratio T/TQ, where TQ is the quantum degeneracy temperature, and then to ramp up the optical-lattice potentials and/or strong interactions at which the subtle quantum phenomena under study may occur. At best, this ramp-up procedure is isentropic and thus reducing the initial temperature by expanding the gas isentropically is no help. Present lower limits on T/TQ are on the order of 0.05, far higher than the 10-4 requirement suggested by the analogy to electronic materials.

Fortunately, having now identified a barrier to further progress, atomic and condensed-matter physicists are dreaming up many possible solutions. One such solution sees its first implementation in the work by Catani et al. Their strategy mimics that of conventional cryogenics, where studying a new target material does not require inventing a new material-specific direct cooling scheme. Rather, one just places the material within an existing, optimized refrigerator. In their experiment, the Florence-Trento team uses a two-part quantum gas, with one part serving as the refrigerator, and the other as the system targeted for study. Now, expanding just the refrigerator gas so as to lower its temperature makes sense; this colder gas is now able to absorb entropy from the target gas, even if the target gas may be difficult to cool directly due to its being strongly self-interacting or held in a deep optical lattice (see Fig. 1).

(Video) 04c How To Calculate The Entropy of The Universe

To realize this idea, Catani and colleagues produced a quantum-gas admixture of bosonic potassium and rubidium atoms, both held in a common magnetic trap. These different elements have different optical resonances, and thus they experience different optical forces when exposed to the same laser fields. The authors show that the target gas (potassium) is compressed into the focal spot formed by laser light at a particular optical wavelength and polarization, while the refrigerator gas (rubidium) experiences hardly any change. Adiabatically compressing the potassium gas on its own would cause its temperature to rise; however, in the presence of the second gas, this heating is mitigated by the transfer of entropy from the potassium to the rubidium atoms.

There are familiar elements in this work. Sympathetic cooling of one atomic system by another co-trapped atomic species has been demonstrated for both neutral atoms [4] and ions [5], and is now common to many experiments. Element-selective optical trapping was proposed earlier for cooling difficult-to-cool gases [6]. However, the Florence-Trento researchers demonstrate two new elements in their two-element experiment. First, unlike single-shot sympathetic cooling experiments, where the coolant gas lowers the target gas entropy by being irreversibly sacrificed to evaporative cooling, here the authors transfer entropy repeatedly to and fro between the refrigerator and target gases. This is demonstrated by passing the target potassium gas repeatedly across the Bose-Einstein condensation phase transition.

Second, the refrigerator gas serves not only as a reservoir but also as a sensor for the entropy variation of the target gas. If the reservoir gas is a well-understood system—for example, a nearly ideal Bose gas, as in the present work—then measurements of its state variables at two different points in the experiment serve to measure directly both the entropy and temperature changes of the target gas, and thereby to obtain its heat capacity. Variations in the heat capacity can reveal the occurrence of phase transitions in the target gas, even when the nature of those transitions is poorly understood. Recall that our present temperature scale (Kelvin) is defined formally according to properties of an ideal gas thermometer. As such, strapping an ideal gas onto an unknown cold-atomic material seems ideal for calorimetric investigations. In future work, I envision that the refrigerator gas can also serve as a reservoir for magnetization, allowing for the identification of magnetic phase transitions as well.

Other solutions to the quantum-gas entropy problem are also being explored. Several rely on the observation that even in the absence of an additional refrigerator gas, the entropy can be sequestered into specific spatial regions of the target gas, where it may be eliminated by spatially selective culling of the atoms. This spatial entropy redistribution was first demonstrated with a single-component Bose gas in a setup similar to that of Catani et al., and the reversible crossing of the Bose-Einstein condensation transition was similarly achieved [7]. For more strongly correlated atomic systems, the spatial concentration of entropy is aided by varying system parameters (the particle density, for instance) so that regions with gapped excitation spectra abut regions with gapless excitations; at a common temperature, the entropy will be higher in the gapless regions [8,9]. Compared with the scheme offered by Catani et al., this latter approach does not require that an additional refrigerator gas be produced and admixed in a manner that somehow does not vary the behavior of the target system. However, the two-gas scheme is more general, not requiring in-depth knowledge of the target system’s phase diagram.

These days, at any gathering of the cold-atoms community, be it an international topical workshop or an impromptu lab meeting, the challenge of achieving lower entropy quantum gases is sure to come up. One is reminded of the heady days in the development of laser cooling (late 1980s and early 1990s, just before my time) when creative and brash atomic scientists conducted their assorted assaults on the temperature limitations of the day. Their past success gives me confidence that the present barriers will be similarly overcome.

References

  1. M. H. Anderson et al., Science 269, 198 (1995)
  2. A. E. Leanhardt et al., Science 301, 1513 (2003)
  3. J. Catani, G. Barontini, G. Lamporesi, F. Rabatti, G. Thalhammer, F. Minardi, S. Stringari, and M. Inguscio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 140401 (2009)
  4. C. J. Myatt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 586 (1997)
  5. D. J. Larson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 70 (1986)
  6. R. Onofrio and C. Presilla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 100401 (2002)
  7. D. M. Stamper-Kurn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2194 (1998)
  8. T.-L. Ho and Q. Zhou, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6916 (2009)
  9. J. S. Bernier et al., Phys. Rev. A 79, 061601 (2009)

About the Author

Shifting entropy elsewhere (4)

Dan Stamper-Kurn obtained his Ph.D. from MIT for work on Bose-Einstein condensation, and was a Millikan Postdoctoral Fellow, researching quantum optics at Caltech, before joining the Berkeley Physics Department in 2000, where he now holds the Class of 1936 Second Chair in Letters and Sciences and also a joint appointment at the Materials Sciences Division of LBNL. His research utilizes quantum gases to study aspects of condensed-matter physics, quantum optics, quantum atom optics, and quantum and precision measurement. His work is recognized by the 2000 DAMOP Thesis Award of the APS, the Sloan and Packard Fellowships, and the 2003 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers.

Entropy Exchange in a Mixture of Ultracold Atoms

J. Catani, G. Barontini, G. Lamporesi, F. Rabatti, G. Thalhammer, F. Minardi, S. Stringari, and M. Inguscio

Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 140401 (2009)

Published September 28, 2009

Read PDF
(Video) Balaji Srinivasan: How to Fix Government, Twitter, Science, and the FDA | Lex Fridman Podcast #331

Subject Areas

Atomic and Molecular Physics

Related Articles

Atomic and Molecular Physics

(Video) Live Stream - The Immutable Laws of the Universe

A Synthetic Lattice in a Cold Atomic Cloud

Defining a fermionic lattice using spin and momentum instead of spatial coordinates opens the door for interacting-fermion simulations with more complex lattice geometries. Read More »

Atomic and Molecular Physics

A Liquid Method to Prepare Ion Beams

A liquid-metal jet can strip electrons from a high-intensity, accelerator-based ion beam, increasing the beam’s charge and enhancing accelerator performance. Read More »

Atomic and Molecular Physics

Controlling Single Photons with Rydberg Superatoms

New schemes based on Rydberg superatoms placed in optical cavities can be used to manipulate single photons with high efficiency. Read More »

(Video) There's a Loophole in One of the Most Important Laws of Physics
More Articles

FAQs

What is the change in entropy when water freezes into ice? ›

Solution : When water freezes to form ice, the randomness or disorderliness decreases i.e., entropy decreases.

Does freezing water decrease entropy? ›

At all temperatures, the entropy of water molecules (the system) decreases upon freezing because water molecules are more ordered in the crystalline state than in the liquid.

What is K in Boltzmann's formula SK Ln W? ›

k is Boltzmann's constant. NA is Avogadro number. R is the gas constant.

How can water's entropy decrease when it freezes without violating the second law of thermodynamics? ›

Answer and Explanation: When water freezes, the liquid form is converted into the solid form. The water molecules become more orderly. Therefore, the entropy of the water is decreased.

Does entropy increase with temperature? ›

Entropy increases as temperature increases. An increase in temperature means that the particles of the substance have greater kinetic energy. The faster-moving particles have more disorder than particles that are moving slowly at a lower temperature.

Does boiling water increase entropy? ›

The entropy increases whenever heat flows from a hot object to a cold object. It increases when ice melts, water is heated, water boils, water evaporates. The entropy increases when a gas flows from a container under high pressure into a region of lower pressure.

Does melting increase entropy? ›

Entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness of the system. The greater the randomness in a system, greater is its entropy. The randomness is greater in liquid state as compared to solid state so the entropy increases when ice melts into water.

Is entropy The Second Law of Thermodynamics? ›

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the state of entropy of the entire universe, as an isolated system, will always increase over time. The second law also states that the changes in the entropy in the universe can never be negative.

Can entropy be reversed? ›

Entropy is a measure of the randomness or disorder within a closed or isolated system, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that as usable energy is lost, chaos increases - and that progression towards disorder can never be reversed.

What is K in entropy? ›

The constant of proportionality k serves to make the statistical mechanical entropy equal to the classical thermodynamic entropy of Clausius: One could choose instead a rescaled dimensionless entropy in microscopic terms such that.

What is Boltzmann theorem of entropy? ›

Boltzmann formula, , says that the entropy of a macroscopic state is proportional to the number of configurations Ω of microscopic states of a system where all microstates are equiprobable.

What is Boltzmann constant in entropy? ›

where is the Boltzmann constant (also written as simply ) and equal to 1.380649 × 1023 J/K, and. is the natural logarithm function. In short, the Boltzmann formula shows the relationship between entropy and the number of ways the atoms or molecules of a certain kind of thermodynamic system can be arranged.

Why Does entropy increase when ice melts into water? ›

Melting ice makes a perfect example of entropy. As ice the individual molecules are fixed and ordered. As ice melts the molecules become free to move therefore becoming disordered. As the water is then heated to become gas, the molecules are then free to move independently through space.

What is the entropy change for a pure liquid freezing into a solid? ›

b.A liquid freezes: -As liquid freezes, the liquid state is converted into a solid-state which has low randomness. So, the entropy change is negative.

Why is the entropy of ice negative? ›

Water freezing into ice is a negative entropy reaction since it's a liquid turning into a solid. A solid has less disorder because the molecules are less free to move. Hydrogen and oxygen combining to form water is a negative entropy reaction.

Does ice or water have a higher entropy? ›

Water is having a higher entropy than the ice and so the entropy will prefer melting. But ice has a smaller energy than water and therefore the energy favours freezing.

Videos

1. You Are Not Where You Think You Are
(Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell)
2. A brief introduction to sofic entropy theory – Lewis Bowen – ICM2018
(Rio ICM2018)
3. Lecture 5g - Entropy
(Chris Bahn)
4. 5.1 Enthalpy vs Entropy
(Jean Davis)
5. Entropy and Gibb's Free Energy
(Samantha Henry)
6. What Actually Expands In An Expanding Universe?
(Veritasium)

Top Articles

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Manual Maggio

Last Updated: 12/08/2022

Views: 5623

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Manual Maggio

Birthday: 1998-01-20

Address: 359 Kelvin Stream, Lake Eldonview, MT 33517-1242

Phone: +577037762465

Job: Product Hospitality Supervisor

Hobby: Gardening, Web surfing, Video gaming, Amateur radio, Flag Football, Reading, Table tennis

Introduction: My name is Manual Maggio, I am a thankful, tender, adventurous, delightful, fantastic, proud, graceful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.